- Roeder: I Was "Defending Innocent Life"
- "I just love this rationale and the rage-inducing parsing contained within. He's not a TOTAL FUCKING HYPOCRITE, you see, because he's specifically pro innocent life, so Dr. Tiller doesn't count.
"Not that Dr. Tiller had broken any actual laws or anything (making him actually and technically 'innocent'). But Tiller broke God's Law, according to Roeder, so he was justified in killing him. Interesting calculation, that. I wonder if Roeder would then support my right to kill anyone who broke a law I thought should be on the books, based on my random and personal belief system. (I don't want to kill anyone—but that's not really the point, now, is it?)"
The Link: Roeder: I Was "Defending Innocent Life" by Lee Salazar, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Terms and conditions beyond the scope of this license may be available at leesalazar.com.