• Annalee Newitz: Watchmen Director Zack Snyder Reveals His Secret Past [True Con­fes­sions] — io9 — “io9’s Nisha Gopalan has a great inter­view with Watchmen director Zack Snyder up at Radar. Snyder spills his guts about his secret past — as a jock! How does he rec­on­cile his jock side with a mega-​​geek movie like Watchmen? Here’s a funny bit from the inter­view where Nisha says, “You’re both jock and geek. Aren’t they sup­posed to be mortal enemies?””
  • A Trilo­bite Made of Welded Steel and Time [Con­cept Art] — io9 -
  • Charlie Jane Anders: Paul Krugman Does Charles Stross! [Charles Stross] — io9 -
  • Jill: A Story in Pic­tures (Fem­i­niste) — “Two of the most impor­tant women’s-rights-related bill-​​signings in the past few years.”
  • Ter­ranceDC: The Ter­rorist at My Bus Stop (Pam’s House Blend) — “Every morning, my neighbor and her six-​​year-​​old daughter share a bus stop with a ter­rorist — or a member of a ter­rorist orga­ni­za­tion, at least. That’s dis­tressing enough, because my son rides the same school bus. But I recently dis­cov­ered that the ter­rorist at my son’s bus stop is me; his Dad, who puts him on the bus each morning. And another ter­rorist, his Papa, picks him up from school every day.”
  • Desk​to​pLinux​.com: Moblin2 first impres­sions — wow, does it boot fast! — “A lot of note­books and even net­books these days run Win­dows, but also offer a min­i­malist Linux envi­ron­ment that boots in sec­onds. Now, with the Intel-​​sponsored Moblin project’s alpha release of Moblin 2 Monday, it looks like insanely fast boots will become a stan­dard fea­ture of full-​​featured Linux desk­tops, too.”
  • A Reminder to Keep Working (Jump off the Bridge) — “My friends don’t seem to love Jay Smooth as much as I do, but that doesn’t make me love him any less. I think by this point there is def­i­nitely an unof­fi­cial fem­i­nist blogger fan club, and I’d like to be Pres­i­dent of said fan club, thanks!” Video.
  • Dday: Impact Of Con­ser­v­a­tive Dem­a­goguery (Hul­la­baloo) — “The result of the recent con­ser­v­a­tive dom­i­nance on cable, even if not a lot of people are watching, is a growing amount of mis­in­for­ma­tion deliv­ered to the public, over the course of many years. One of the rea­sons we focus on this and think it’s so impor­tant is that pro­gres­sives are cut­ting through 30 years’ worth of rhetoric designed to push con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment ideas into the main­stream. And without a sus­tained effort to demys­tify those ideas, they will hold in the minds of the public EVEN IF the result of those ideas has been disaster.”…the effect here is that con­ser­v­a­tive ideas are still respected while con­ser­v­a­tives aren’t.

    As it stands right now, there’s one man being lis­tened to seri­ously that can com­mand an audi­ence: the Pres­i­dent. He hasn’t used the bully pulpit to a great degree yet, though I assume that’s coming. Until con­ser­v­a­tive ideas are rejected, we will con­tinue in this muddle, blocked from the tools we need to get out of this eco­nomic crisis.”

  • Digby: Punk’d (Hul­la­baloo) — “We’ve seen this movie before. It was 1993 and we had another young pres­i­dent (faced then with a strong and growing Repub­lican party) who had promised to end the “brain­dead pol­i­tics of the past.” The forces of the status quo schooled him right out of the gate about who was in charge and no matter how much he appeased them, it was never enough. Clinton sur­vived a vicious par­tisan onslaught, but he also had the ben­efit of a quick recovery from a mild reces­sion and a tech­nology bubble of mas­sive pro­por­tions to help him.“Obama is facing a weaker Repub­lican Party but a much bigger set of prob­lems, with the stakes being expo­nen­tially higher. We just don’t have time for this non­sense again. At some point, the Democ­rats are going to have to con­front their cen­tral polit­ical problem, which is that the con­ser­v­a­tives are not appeasable and that polit­ical and media elites have either been brain­washed by con­ser­v­a­tive pro­pa­ganda or are con­ser­v­a­tives by choice and they have to con­vince the cit­i­zenry that their ide­ology is better for their per­sonal well being and the well being of the country. Until that hap­pens, the con­ser­v­a­tives will remain in power even as an oppo­si­tion force and their failed ide­ology will con­tinue to destroy this country. This isn’t a game any­more. They have to pass good policies.”
  • Tiger Beat­down: The Trials of Mod­erate Lead­er­ship — “I cannot deal with cen­trism, I have dis­cov­ered. I am a simple woman with simple thoughts. I think of things in terms of “right” (all people are cre­ated equal = right!) and “wrong” (people who are born women do not have the right to self-​​determination or bodily autonomy = wrong!) and shady moral com­pro­mises wherein you sit everyone down at the table and give each of them a part of what they want even if what they want is kind of evil… do not trans­late to my mind. I am either thrilled by Obama or seri­ously dis­ap­pointed by Obama. Remember when jour­nal­ists were all coming up with cute catch phrases con­taining the let­ters “O-​​B-​​A-​​M” in that order, like “Oba­mania?” Well, I have Oba­manic Depres­sion. It sucks.”
  • Incertus: My Fellow Whiteys… — “…on the ending of Rev­erend Lowery’s bene­dic­tion at the inau­gu­ra­tion of Pres­i­dent Obama…” Basi­cally, if what Lowery said is not about you, then it’s not about you.
  • Amanda Mar­cotte: Con­ces­sions count for a piece of lint and that weird thing you found in the lit­terbox (Pandagon) — “As Jesse said to me in chat, Repub­li­cans are more afraid of Lim­baugh than they are of Obama. And Lim­baugh has expressed his marching orders—Obama must fail, and they must put their efforts to that goal. Obama was able to count on a least a handful of Repub­li­cans to be decent friends to him in the Senate, but I hope he real­izes that they are his blood ene­mies now and will sac­ri­fice any­thing to fuck him over now that he’s President.“All that said, it’s quickly becoming obvious that Repub­li­cans are putting a lot of eggs into the misogyny basket in hopes of wearing down the public’s com­mit­ment to hope and progress. While the birth con­trol thing was far from the only con­ces­sion demanded, it dom­i­nated the media cov­erage, and I think that was a delib­erate choice. In addi­tion, Senate Repub­li­cans put on a big show of writing a bill to rein­state the global gag rule, even though they had to know it wouldn’t pass. I can barely keep up with the amount of crap being poured out from right wing media sources lying about this sexual health issue or that. Like Brad at Sadly, No said, “If there’s one big draw­back to the Obama admin­is­tra­tion thus far, it’s that they’ve inspired wingnuts to write a lot about sex again.” And writing about sex is basi­cally using tit­il­la­tion to push a misog­y­nist, homo­phobic mes­sage. The reason for the obses­sion with sex (really with misogyny and homo­phobia) hasn’t changed—it’s always been about dis­tracting people from eco­nomic issues with the deadly com­bi­na­tion of prej­u­dice and titillation—but it seems that they hope they can double down on this with the hopes that people will be so wor­ried that some lady down the street is fucking and get­ting away with it that they will stop thinking about the danger of get­ting laid off.”
  • Kara: Obama Signs the Lilly Led­better Fair Pay Act (Fem­i­niste) — “Pres­i­dent Barack Obama has just signed his first piece of leg­is­la­tion — and in a move that will hold much sym­bolism for women and all invested in their equality, it was the Lilly Led­better Fair Pay Act.”
  • Jill: Shock­ingly, caving to right-​​wing inter­ests does not achieve pro­gres­sive goals. (Fem­i­niste) — “Obama pres­sured Dems to cut a pro­vi­sion of the stim­ulus package that would have made it easier for states to use Med­icaid to cover birth con­trol for low-​​income women. The rea­soning? It would foster bipar­ti­san­ship and get Repub­li­cans on board with the stim­ulus as a whole.“The out­come? Not a single Repub­lican voted for the BC-​​free stim­ulus package.

    The problem with bipar­ti­san­ship as a goal is that both sides have to want it. I don’t have a problem with making polit­ican com­pro­mises or with gen­uine bipar­tisan coöper­a­tion, but you’d better make sure that the people you’re “com­pro­mising” with are going to give some­thing in return before you start scaling back your own plan.

    Plus what Katha says. Birth con­trol belongs in the stim­ulus package.”